Many of you know that I love the concept of using technology to overcome the shortfalls of what schools can offer. With that in mind, I am about to offend many of you that think similarly to me. So my caveat is simply this, "these are my thoughts, my beliefs, and you may not agree...get over it...or better yet, weigh in on the topic." Yes, that's a challenge and a hope to get some energy going here on a topic that can really have an impact on the future of schools.
I just read a
pretty decent article in the Mason City Globe Gazette on how technology can play into the future of schools. My concern is definitely not the use of on-line learning. I believe this is essential in supporting the needs of our students. I do not, however, have confidence in those that are promoting fully digitized learning that would evade the necessity of face-to-face learning in a brick-and-mortar setting. Often these are used as punchlines for the digital progress crowd, indicating that these concepts are outdated and a useless waste of time. My argument is just the opposite. I believe that we are dangerously close to losing the skill set necessary to survive in the real world. Exactly what the real world is has even come under fire, so I'm here to give you the "Marshall Lewis definition" of what it is. Yes, soon to be fully understood by all, the real world is a combination of digital communication, interpersonal socialization, access to information, trust and team building, understanding of interdependence, and a respect of the skills of each person on the planet. So that is a smattering of what the real world actually is, but what is missing? The bottom line is we can neither ignore and avoid technology, but we also must realize that we are social creatures. Much of our life - whether work, family, religion, friends, or anything else - is not based in technology.
I can hold off for now expanding this concept into how it could/would create havoc and disarray (the opposite goal of technology) in our school system. Those that are pushing to become totally digital are risking more than that. They are risking personal identities that are so important to the human race. So much is required of schools that are not stated in terms of NCLB or test scores. How many times have you heard that schools are asked to raise our children. Although that is too simply stated, the concept is accurate - social skills are developed in our school systems. Those that don't do this create future adults that are less likely to be productive in our global society. I believe that is why you see the prediction from Stanford University's Terry Moe of a "hybrid school" at the end of the article noted above. Maybe he's right...that's one I can live with.